Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement glossary. by United States. Bureau of Land Management.

Cover of: Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement | United States. Bureau of Land Management.

Published by U.S. Dept of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management : for sale by the Supt of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off. in Washington .

Written in English

Read online

Subjects:

  • Natural gas -- Alaska -- Transportation.,
  • Natural gas pipelines -- Alaska.

Edition Notes

Cover title.

Book details

The Physical Object
Pagination[2], 36 p. ;
Number of Pages36
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL17645252M

Download Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement

Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Systems; Final environmental Impact Statement Volume II [Federal Power Commission Staff] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Systems; Final environmental Impact Statement Volume IIAuthor: Federal Power Commission Staff. Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Systems; Final environmental Impact Statement Volume III [Federal Power Commission Staff] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Systems; Final environmental Impact Statement Volume IIIAuthor: Federal Power Commission Staff.

Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement: Los Angeles. [United States. Bureau of Land Management,] -- "This volume relates to the mile portion proposed by Interstate Transmission (Arctic) extending from the point of.

Cover title: Alaska natural gas transportation systems, final environmental impact statement. Dockets nos. CP (El Paso Alaska Company), CP. Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement: San Francisco.

[United States. Bureau of Land Management,] -- Action pending is granting rights-of-way permits for crossing Federal lands. A 5,mile buried pipeline has been proposed to transport natural gas from Prudhoe Bay (Alaska) to markets in the lower.

Get this from a library. Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement: Alaska. [United States. Bureau of Land Management.]. texts All Books All Texts latest This Just In Smithsonian Libraries FEDLINK Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement: Alaska Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement: Alaska by United States.

Bureau of Land Management. Publication date Topics. texts All Books All Texts latest This Just In Smithsonian Libraries FEDLINK (US) NASA Images Solar System Collection Ames Research Center.

Brooklyn Museum. Full text of "Alaska natural gas transportation system: final environmental impact statement: overview". Final environmental impact statement for the Alaska natural gas transportation systems ; Trans-Alaska gas system draft environmental impact statement ; Alaska LNG Project, draft environmental impact statement ; Guidelines for preparation of an environmental impact statement for the Foothills (Yukon) Limited gas pipeline, Yukon Territory - Canada.

Alaska natural gas transportation system final environmental impact statement: Canada Item Preview. On J FERC published its Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Alaska LNG Project proposed by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation.

The draft EIS assesses the potential environmental effects of the construction and operation of the Alaska LNG Project in accordance with the. Final environmental impact statement, Alaska Stand Alone Gas Pipeline. An environmental assessment of the mile ASAP pipeline which Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC) proposes to build and operate.

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. Conserving, improving, and protecting Alaska's natural resources and environment to enhance the health, safety, economic, and social well-being of Alaskans. Department of Environmental Conservation. Mailing Address: P.O. Box Juneau, Alaska June Trans-Alaska Gas System Final Environmental Impact Statement by the Bureau of Land Management and U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers was published. The Department of Interior issued a grant of right-of-way to Yukon Pacific Corporation for the Trans-Alaska Gas System. texts All Books All Texts latest This Just In Smithsonian Libraries FEDLINK (US) Genealogy Lincoln Collection.

National Emergency Library. Top American Libraries Canadian Libraries Universal Library Community Texts Project Gutenberg Biodiversity Heritage Library Children's Library. Open Library. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released the final supplemental environmental impact statement for the roughly $10 billion Alaska Standalone Pipeline.

its final environmental impact statement to Canada's Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office. Arlon Tussing and Connie Barlow released their report to the Alaska State Legislature on the financing problems of the gas pipeline.

In The Alaska Highway Pipeline: A look at the Current Impasse, they concluded thatFile Size: 99KB. Final environmental impact statement for the proposed Trans-Alaska Gas System.

An environmental impact statement for the proposal by Yukon Pacific Corporation to build a mile long buried, chilled, high pressure natural gas pipeline from Prudhoe Bay to Anderson Bay, Alaska. The project is called Trans-Alaska Gas System (TAGS).

selection of a transportation system to deliver North Slope natural gas to the continental U.S. Ma The Minister of Fisheries and the Environment, Canada, established the Environmental Assessment Review Panel, chaired by Dr. Harry Hill. its directive was to assess the environmental impact of the Alcan Project, in the Size: KB.

Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). FERC Staff Issues the Final EIS for the Alaska LNG Project (CP) Issued: March 6, The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS) to assess the impacts of constructing and operating the Alaska LNG Project (Project) proposed by the Alaska.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Friday issued the final environmental impact statement, or EIS, for the roughly $40 billion Alaska LNG Project, a. Environmental impact assessment for Alaska’s oil and gas activities released The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has released a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) analyzing the possible environmental impacts of oil and gas development in the federal submerged lands of Cook Inlet, off Alaska’s southcentral coast.

The pipeline system was designed to transport natural gas that would be accessible to and useable by communities, government entities, and natural resource development projects.

The proposed ASAP route generally parallels the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) and Dalton Highway corridor to near Livengood, northwest of Fairbanks.

Federal Task Force on Alaskan Oil Development. U.S. Department of the Interior. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 5, page 3. Washington, D.C. Oil has been shipped on tankers directly from Prudhoe Bay in northern Alaska for many years.

The dangers, though, make this option too environmentally risky. Shipping east through the ArcticFile Size: KB. The action pending is granting right-of-way permits for crossing Federal lands. A 6,mile underground pipeline has been proposed to transport natural gas from Prudhoe Bay (Alaska) to markets in the lower United States.

Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and a heavy hydrocarbon removal system (to remove natural gas liquids); two separate propane precooled mixed refrigerant liquefaction trains that liquefy natural gas, each with a nominal liquefaction capacity of 5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) and a maximum capacity of more than mtpa of LNG.

Alaska LNG will use clean, energy-efficient, and safe production methods to deliver a stable supply of natural gas for commercialization and for in-state distribution. North Slope fields are expected to deliver on average about billion cubic feet of gas per day, much of it for an international market.

Alberta natural gas to United States markets scheduled to start November 1, Foothills Pipe Lines (Yukon) Ltd., Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Ltd., and Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd. issued a joint statement expressing their support of the prebuild proposal for the Alaska gasline system.

In their statement. final report on burst tests, conducted in Alberta between and May 5, The Governor's Task Force on State of Alaska Participation in the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System Financing issued its findings to the hearings in Whitehorse on the potential environmental impact pipeline construction in Yukon Territories.

This File Size: 47KB. Pipeline. The backbone of the project is an mile, inch diameter pipeline. With a daily capacity of billion cubic feet, multiple compressor stations along the pipeline will help carry natural gas from the North Slope to Southcentral Alaska.

AOGA/IAGC/API Comments to NMFS on Final Environmental Impact Statement for Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic Ocean: 11/17/ AOGA Comments to ADEC on APDES: 10/17/ AOGA Comments to USFWS on Draft Endangered Species. Start Preamble. The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) with the participation of the cooperating agencies listed below, has prepared a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Alaska LNG Project (Project) proposed by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC).

The Alaska gas pipeline is a joint project of TransCanada Corp. and ExxonMobil Corp. to develop a natural gas pipeline under the AGIA, a.k.a.

the Alaska Gas Inducement Act, adopted by Alaska Legislature in The project originally proposed two options during its open season offering over a three-month period from April 30 to J An 'open season' in layman's terms is when a Country: United States, Canada.

The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Jordan Cove Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project and the Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline Project (collectively referred to as the Project) proposed by Jordan Cove Energy Project L.P.

(Jordan Cove) and. On March 4,the Commission issued a Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Planned Alaska LNG Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues (NOI) during the pre-filing review.

In OctoberFERC issued two supplemental Notices regarding public scoping meetings for the Alaska LNG Project. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Rover Pipeline, Panhandle Backhaul, and Trunkline Backhaul Projects (Docket Nos. CP, CP and CP) Issued: J The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Rover Pipeline.

Industries Natural Gas Environment Environmental Documents Final Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) FERC issues Final Environmental Impact Statement on Cameron LNG, LLC’s and Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC’s Liquefaction Project.

DEC Releases Updated Alaska Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report. For immediate release — Janu Contact: Denise Koch, Division of Air Quality,@ Juneau, AK — The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) today released its updated Alaska Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report.

The report. A copy may be obtained from the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. Environmental Impact Statement. Crude Oil Transportation System: Valdez, Alaska to Midland, Texas, Department of Interior. Bureau of Land Management, Washington, D.C.

This is an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared for the SOHIO proposal. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission released its final environmental impact statement on the $43 billion project proposed by the Alaska Gasline Development Corp., a state agency.

The proposal is for a pipeline of about miles to take natural gas from Alaska’s North Slope to a liquefaction plant in Cook Inlet, in southcentral Alaska. Donlin's preferred design for the project anticipates a throughput of approximat tons per day.

Donlin's proposal to power the mine includes a inch diameter, mile natural gas pipeline that would start in Beluga, Alaska, pass through the Alaska Range, and continue on to the mine site.The commission issued its final environment impact statement in March and is due to vote in early June on AGDC’s application to construct the gas treatment plant at Prudhoe Bay, the pipeline.The Kavik River is an mile-long ( km) river in the North Slope region of Alaska.

It is swift-flowing and is winter, parts of the Kavik (and the nearby Canning River) are covered with extensive ice sheets known as aufeis.: ⁃ coordinates: 69°08′27″N °18′17″W .

6044 views Friday, November 27, 2020